Tesla vs Rivian Lemon Law Problems: What California Owners Report

Published October 19, 2026 · Updated October 19, 2026 · California lemon law

Which has more lemon law problems in California, Tesla or Rivian?

Side-by-Side Comparison

What California Tesla Owners Report

California owners of 2019 to 2027 model year Teslas filed 2,486 NHTSA complaints between 2021 and 2026. Collision warning and driver-assist systems led by a wide margin with 594 complaints. Steering followed with 258, brakes with 243, the electrical system with 240 and speed control with 186.

The Model Y had 1,165 complaints and the Model 3 had 915. Together, those two models account for the large majority of Tesla reports in this data. The Model X (193), Model S (155) and Cybertruck (57) followed.

Tesla complaints are concentrated in the Bay Area and Southern California. Los Angeles had 157, San Jose 121, San Diego 106, San Francisco 90 and Irvine 57. San Jose and Irvine both ranking this high reflects where Teslas are most common in the state.

Speed control showing up in the top five is worth noting. That category covers complaints about how the car accelerates, slows or holds speed. Combined with the driver-assist and brakes numbers, a large share of Tesla complaints involve how the car moves, not just comfort or convenience features.

• Collision warning and driver-assist systems: 594 complaints
• Steering: 258 complaints
• Brakes: 243 complaints
• Electrical system: 240 complaints
• Speed control: 186 complaints

What California Rivian Owners Report

Rivian owners in California filed 102 NHTSA complaints for the same model years and filing period. The R1S had 62 and the R1T had 38. Rivian is a much newer and smaller brand, so the total is far lower than Tesla's.

Airbags were the most-reported Rivian area with 22 complaints. The electrical system had 12, brakes 10, suspension 9, and collision warning and driver-assist systems 7. With numbers this small, a handful of reports can change the order, so it is better to read Rivian's list as a snapshot than as a trend.

Rivian complaints came from San Diego (8), Los Angeles (6), San Jose (5), San Francisco (4) and Redondo Beach (3). Again, the small sample means these city counts mostly show where early owners live.

Suspension appearing in Rivian's top five is a difference from Tesla, where it does not. Airbags at the top is also a contrast. Tesla owners report driver-assist problems most, while Rivian owners report airbag concerns most. Both airbags and driver-assist faults can be safety defects, which changes how many repair attempts the law expects.

Direct Service Centers and Over-the-Air Updates: Keep the Paper Trail

Tesla and Rivian both sell and service mostly through their own locations instead of franchised dealers. That means your warranty repairs usually happen at a Tesla or Rivian service center, or through a mobile technician the company sends. The company named in a claim is Tesla, Inc. or Rivian Automotive, LLC.

Service at these brands often starts in the phone app. You describe the problem, a technician may diagnose it remotely, and sometimes the fix is a software update pushed over the air. Those steps can leave a thinner paper trail than a traditional dealer visit, so you need to build your own.

Download or screenshot every service request, every message from the service team, every estimate and every final invoice or work order. If the app shows a closed service visit, save it as a PDF or screenshot with the date showing. If a technician tells you an update should fix the problem, write down the date, the software version and what you were told.

Whether a remote fix or update counts as a repair attempt can be disputed, so document it the same way you would document a shop visit. If the problem comes back after an update, open a new service request right away and describe it in the same words you used before.

• Screenshots of each app service request and its status
• Final invoices or work orders for every visit, including mobile service
• Software version numbers before and after updates
• Messages from the service team about the problem

How Driver-Assist and Airbag Defects Fit California Law

The lemon law requires the manufacturer to replace or repurchase a vehicle when it cannot fix a warranty defect that substantially impairs use, value or safety after a reasonable number of attempts (Civil Code 1793.2(d)(2)). If you choose restitution, the manufacturer refunds what you paid, including taxes and fees, minus a mileage offset.

Within 18 months or 18,000 miles, the law presumes a reasonable number of attempts when a defect likely to cause death or serious injury has been repaired 2 or more times (Civil Code 1793.22(b)). Unexpected braking, steering that fights the driver, sudden changes in speed, and an airbag system that may not deploy correctly can all raise that question.

The presumption also applies after 4 repairs of the same defect or more than 30 days out of service. Separately, the manufacturer must complete repairs within 30 days unless you agree to more time (Civil Code 1793.2(b)). If you are waiting weeks for a part or an appointment, track every day.

If the warranty or owner's manual clearly requires direct notice to the manufacturer, send it. With a direct-sales brand, the service center is the manufacturer, but a short written notice through the official support channel is still a smart step.

Why 2,486 vs 102 Is Not a Fair Reliability Comparison

Tesla has about 24 times as many California complaints as Rivian in this data. That gap says far more about how many of each brand are on the road than about how well either is built. Tesla has sold several high-volume models in California for years, while Rivian's lineup in this period is mostly two vehicles.

Reporting habits matter too. EV owners are often comfortable with online tools and may file NHTSA reports more readily than some other drivers. Owners of a newer brand may also report differently from owners of an established one. None of that is captured in a raw count.

NHTSA complaints are owner reports, not confirmed defects. They are useful for seeing which systems owners talk about most, but they are not a ranking. A Rivian owner with one stubborn airbag fault and a Tesla owner with a recurring braking problem are judged by the same law and the same kind of evidence: their own repair records.

The Cybertruck count (57) is a good example of why timing matters too. A model that has been on sale for a shorter time has had less time to collect reports. As more owners drive it, the count will change, and that change will not necessarily mean anything about quality.

If you want to see whether your own problem is widespread, search NHTSA's complaint and recall tools by your model and year. That can help you describe the issue to a service center, but you do not need other complaints to have a valid claim.

Example: An R1S With a Recurring Airbag Warning

This is a made-up example for illustration only. Marcus bought a new R1S and lives near Redondo Beach. At 3,500 miles, a passenger airbag warning appeared on the display. He opened a service request in the Rivian app, and a mobile technician replaced a seat sensor connector in his driveway.

Two weeks later the warning returned. This time the vehicle went into a service center for four days. Marcus saved the app request, the technician notes and the final invoice. When the warning came back a third time after a software update, he took screenshots showing the warning and the date.

Marcus then asked for a free case review. The attorney focused on whether an airbag fault was a defect likely to cause serious injury, which could make 2 attempts enough, and whether the mobile visit and the update each counted as an attempt. Marcus kept making his loan payments throughout. If he wins, Rivian Automotive, LLC pays his attorney fees and costs (Civil Code 1794(d)).

The same steps would apply to a Tesla owner. If a Model Y kept braking for shadows after several service visits and updates, the owner would gather the app history and invoices, note each date, and ask for a review. The brand changes the company name on the claim, not the rules.

Documents to Gather and What to Do Next

Because Tesla and Rivian records live largely in an app and an online account, start by exporting what you can. Many owners find it easiest to make a folder on their computer and save every invoice and screenshot by date. Do this now, while the visits are fresh, rather than when a claim is already underway.

Next, list each time the problem happened, even if you did not open a service request that day. A simple log with the date, the mileage, the weather and road conditions, and what the vehicle did is often more useful than memory. If a safety problem happens, you can also report it to NHTSA and save the confirmation.

Check whether any recall applies to your VIN. A recall repair can count as a repair attempt, and the recall notice is one more dated record of a known issue. Keep it with your file.

Claims are time-sensitive. Warranty claims generally must be filed within four years (Commercial Code 2725), and for manufacturers that opted in to the 2025 rules, many claims now have pre-lawsuit steps. A free case review can sort out timing for you. Keep making loan or lease payments while you wait.

• Purchase or lease agreement and delivery paperwork
• App service history, invoices and mobile service records
• Your own problem log with dates and mileage
• Any recall notices and NHTSA report confirmations
• Rental, towing or charging costs caused by the defect

Signs Your Tesla May Qualify

• Your Tesla has been in for the collision warning and driver-assist systems 2 or more times and it is a safety issue
• The same Tesla problem has been repaired 4 or more times
• Your Tesla has been out of service more than 30 days for warranty repairs
• You own a Tesla Model Y and the problem keeps coming back

Signs Your Rivian May Qualify

• Your Rivian has been in for the airbags 2 or more times and it is a safety issue
• The same Rivian problem has been repaired 4 or more times
• Your Rivian has been out of service more than 30 days for warranty repairs
• You own a Rivian R1S and the problem keeps coming back

Key Facts (as of October 2026)

• Complaint counts are California owner reports to NHTSA for 2019 to 2027 model years, filed 2021 to 2026. They are not verified defects and are not adjusted for sales.
• The two brands' top problem areas differ: Tesla owners report the collision warning and driver-assist systems most, Rivian owners the airbags.
• For either brand, a reasonable number of repair attempts is presumed within 18 months or 18,000 miles after 2 tries for a serious safety defect, 4 tries for the same defect, or more than 30 days in the shop (Civil Code 1793.22(b)).

Talk It Through With a Lemon Law Attorney

Every case is different. Our attorneys, listed in firm order: #1 Jacob Shayesteh (founding attorney), #2 Armig Khodanian and #3 Kamau Edwards, will look at your repair history and tell you which option fits. 5.0 stars on Google from 77 reviews (October 2026). You pay $0, win or lose.

What Our Clients Say on Google

“They were incredibly professional, fast, and efficient, taking over all the stressful communication with the manufacturer so I didn't have to. In the end, they secured a full lemon law refund for me, which covered not just the vehicle cost, but all of my registration fees, taxes, and finance charges.”

Aaron K. · 2024 Mercedes-Benz EQE · 5-star Google review

“He helped me obtain all of my repair records and purchase documents through the vehicle's app within the hour and officially started my California Lemon Law case the same day. The entire process was straightforward and stress-free, and I never had to deal directly with the manufacturer.”

Miki B. · Lemon law client · 5-star Google review

“My husband spoke with Jacob directly, and the process could not have been easier. He handled everything from start to finish and was able to secure a full buyback for the family.”

Jen B. · Family vehicle · 5-star Google review

Read all 78 reviews on Google (5.0 stars, October 2026). Reviews describe past clients' experiences; every case is different.

FAQ

Is it harder to win a lemon law case against Tesla or Rivian?

Neither badge changes the rules. A Tesla claim and a Rivian claim both turn on the repair history, the defect and whether the dealer could fix it.

What do California Tesla owners complain about most?

In NHTSA complaints from California owners, the top areas are the collision warning and driver-assist systems, steering and brakes. The most complaints were for the Tesla Model Y, Tesla Model 3 and Tesla Model X.

What do California Rivian owners complain about most?

In NHTSA complaints from California owners, the top areas are the airbags, electrical system and brakes. The most complaints were for the Rivian R1S, Rivian R1T and Rivian EDV.

Sources and Official References

• NHTSA recall lookup by VIN
• NHTSA, report a vehicle safety problem
• California Civil Code section 1793.2 (California Legislature)
• California Civil Code section 1793.22 (California Legislature)
• U.S. DOE and EPA fuel economy and EV information

Laws change. This page reflects California law as of October 2026 and was reviewed by Jacob Shayesteh, Esq.

Related Guides

• Choosing a Tesla lemon law attorney
• Choosing a Rivian lemon law attorney
• Hyundai vs Kia Lemon Law Problems
• Ford vs Ram Lemon Law Problems
• Chevrolet vs GMC Lemon Law Problems
• Jeep vs Ford Lemon Law Problems
• BMW vs Mercedes-Benz Lemon Law Problems
• Audi vs BMW Lemon Law Problems
• See all lemon law comparisons

Attorney advertising. Wynn Law Group, APC, 10850 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1010, Los Angeles, CA 90024. General information, not legal advice. Results vary. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.