California Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act

Steering Defects & California Lemon Law

Steering pull, power steering failure, vibration through the wheel, or a vehicle that wanders? Steering defects are safety issues — you may qualify after just 2 failed repair attempts.

Get a Free Case Review

39
Makes Covered
$0
Out of Pocket
3,000+
Cases Won

Do Steering Problems Qualify for Lemon Law?

Steering defects directly affect your ability to control the vehicle and represent some of the most serious lemon law claims. California courts frequently treat steering failures as safety defects, meaning you may only need 2 failed repair attempts rather than the standard 4.

Common Steering Defects That Qualify

  • Consistent pull to one side requiring constant correction
  • Power steering failure or sudden loss of power assist
  • Vibration, shuddering, or wobble through the steering wheel
  • Loose, vague, or excessively light steering feel
  • Steering wheel off-center when driving straight
  • Electronic power steering (EPS) warning lights
  • Clunking or grinding sounds when turning

Repair Attempts for Steering Defects

Steering defects that impair vehicle control qualify as safety defects under California law, requiring only 2 failed repair attempts. For less severe steering problems, the standard 4 repair attempts or 30+ days out of service threshold applies.

Find Your Car Brand Below

Select your manufacturer for make-specific lemon law information, NHTSA complaint data, and what you may be owed.

Steering Lemon Law — Frequently Asked Questions

My car pulls to one side — is that a safety defect?

A significant and persistent pull that requires constant driver correction to maintain a straight lane is generally considered a safety defect. The more severe the pull, the stronger your argument for the 2-attempt threshold.

The dealer aligned my car but it still pulls — does that count?

Yes. An alignment that temporarily reduces but does not eliminate the pull, or one that fails to hold within a normal time period, constitutes a repair attempt on the underlying defect.

What is an EPS (electric power steering) failure?

Electric power steering systems can fail suddenly, leaving you with very heavy manual steering or — in extreme cases — no steering assist at all. This is a clear safety defect qualifying for lemon law protection after just 2 failed repairs.

Not Sure If Your Steering Defects Qualifies?

Our attorneys evaluate every case for free. Under California Civil Code § 1794(d), if you win, the manufacturer pays all attorney fees.

Get a Free Case Review

Common Steering System Failures Covered Under California Lemon Law

Steering system defects are among the most serious safety failures a vehicle can develop. The ability to control the vehicle’s direction is fundamental to safe operation — any defect that makes steering unpredictable, heavy, erratic, or unresponsive creates immediate life-threatening risk. Under California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, steering defects that impair vehicle safety qualify for a lemon law buyback after as few as two unsuccessful repair attempts. Manufacturers must repair steering defects completely and permanently; a steering problem that returns after each repair attempt demonstrates the manufacturer’s inability to remedy the defect within a reasonable number of attempts. Document every steering complaint with dates, mileage, and specific conditions — and contact a lemon law attorney immediately if steering problems persist.

Electric Power Steering (EPS) Motor and System Failures

Electric power steering has replaced hydraulic power steering as the dominant technology in new vehicles because it eliminates the hydraulic pump, fluid, hoses, and fittings of the traditional system, reducing weight, eliminating potential fluid leaks, and improving fuel economy by not continuously driving a hydraulic pump. The EPS system uses an electric motor — mounted either on the steering column (column-assist EPS) or on the steering rack itself (rack-assist EPS) — to provide the steering assist that reduces the effort required for the driver to turn the wheel. The motor’s output is controlled by the EPS control module based on signals from the torque sensor (which measures how much force the driver is applying to the steering wheel), the vehicle speed sensor, and in some systems, the steering angle sensor and lateral acceleration sensor.

EPS motor failures cause sudden, complete loss of power steering assist — the steering wheel becomes extremely heavy and difficult to turn, requiring significantly more physical effort than most drivers anticipate. Unlike hydraulic power steering failure, which allows the vehicle to be steered with greater effort but still within most drivers’ physical capability, electric power steering failures can be more abrupt and dramatic, occurring without warning during normal driving rather than appearing gradually as hydraulic fluid pressure drops. An EPS failure at highway speed during a lane change or evasive maneuver can cause the driver to lose directional control because the sudden increase in steering effort prevents the correction the driver intended to make. This makes EPS motor failure a critical safety defect that must be repaired immediately and that meets the heightened repair threshold for safety defects under California lemon law.

EPS control module failures can manifest in multiple ways beyond complete assist loss: the system may provide inconsistent assist that varies unpredictably between light and heavy at the same vehicle speed and steering angle; the system may generate a “steering fault” warning and enter a reduced-assist or no-assist mode; or the system may provide excessive assist that makes the steering feel artificially light and disconnected (“numb”) with poor road feel feedback. Repeated EPS control module replacements or software reprogramming events that fail to permanently restore consistent, appropriate steering feel demonstrate the manufacturer’s inability to repair the defect. In some vehicles, the EPS system also manages lane keep assist steering corrections — an EPS defect simultaneously disables this safety feature, compounding the safety impairment.

Steering Rack and Pinion Defects

The steering rack and pinion assembly is the mechanical interface between the steering column’s rotational motion and the linear motion of the tie rods that actually turn the wheels. The pinion gear — attached to the bottom of the steering column — meshes with the rack gear’s teeth to convert rotation into side-to-side movement of the rack. In hydraulic power steering systems, a hydraulic valve integral to the rack and pinion directs fluid pressure to assist the rack’s movement. In electric rack-assist EPS systems, the electric motor drives a ball screw mechanism to assist the rack. Rack and pinion assembly defects include: worn or damaged gear teeth causing looseness and imprecise steering response; internal seal failures in hydraulic systems causing fluid leaks and loss of assist; and ball screw mechanism wear causing steering assistance that varies with rack position.

Steering rack looseness — also called “play” — is a condition where the driver can move the steering wheel through a small arc without any corresponding movement of the front wheels. All steering systems have a small amount of design play to accommodate manufacturing tolerances, but play that exceeds the manufacturer’s specification causes a steering wheel that feels loose and disconnected from the wheels, a condition drivers describe as a “dead zone” around the center where steering inputs don’t produce a response. Excessive steering play causes the driver to constantly make small corrections to maintain a straight course, increases driver fatigue on long drives, and degrades directional stability at highway speeds. When steering rack play develops within the warranty period, it indicates premature wear of the rack and pinion gear meshes from inadequate lubrication, manufacturing tolerances outside specification, or material hardness deficiencies.

Hydraulic power steering rack leaks — where internal or external seals fail and allow power steering fluid to leak — cause progressive loss of power steering assist as the fluid level drops, and eventually cause the power steering pump to run dry, which can destroy the pump and potentially cause the pump’s drive belt to slip. Power steering fluid leaking onto the exhaust system creates a fire risk. Some rack leaks are internal — where fluid bypasses the internal sealing between the two hydraulic chambers — and cause reduced or inconsistent assist without any visible external leak. These internal rack leaks are frequently misdiagnosed because there is no visible fluid on the ground or in the engine compartment despite the power steering reservoir level dropping. A steering rack that is replaced and leaks again within the warranty period demonstrates a systematic component defect or an underlying cause that the manufacturer has not identified.

Tie Rod and Steering Linkage Failures

Tie rods are the final link in the steering system — the rods that connect the steering rack to the steering knuckle at each front wheel and translate the rack’s lateral movement into the steering angle of the wheels. Each front wheel has an inner tie rod that threads into the rack end and an outer tie rod that connects to the steering knuckle via a ball joint. The outer tie rod end’s ball joint is designed to allow the necessary articulation as the suspension moves through its travel while maintaining a precise connection that keeps the front toe alignment correct. Worn or failed tie rod ball joints cause loose, imprecise steering response, a tendency for the vehicle to wander on the highway, tire wear from incorrect toe alignment, and a clunking sensation when the steering is moved with the vehicle stationary.

Tie rod failures — where the tie rod itself bends, the threads strip, or the ball joint separates from the socket — cause sudden loss of steering control for the affected front wheel. If a tie rod separates while the vehicle is moving, the affected wheel can fold into any position and the driver has no control over it. This type of catastrophic steering failure has caused numerous accidents and is an immediate safety defect. Tie rod failures within the warranty period — particularly at low mileages where the component should have far exceeded its design service life — indicate manufacturing defects in the tie rod material, thread quality, or ball joint construction. California lemon law provides particularly strong protection against safety defects, and a tie rod failure or near-failure is unambiguously a safety defect requiring aggressive warranty enforcement.

Steering intermediate shaft and universal joint failures produce a clunking, clicking, or binding sensation that is transmitted through the steering wheel during parking maneuvers and at very low speeds when the steering torque is highest. The intermediate shaft connects the steering column to the rack and pinion with one or two universal joints (U-joints) that accommodate the angle changes required by the steering column’s geometry. These U-joints must operate smoothly throughout their angular range without binding or generating noise. Binding U-joints cause the steering effort to vary throughout the steering arc — requiring less effort in some wheel positions and significantly more in others — which is described as “steering that catches” or “notchy steering.” This steering effort variation is both a defect and a safety concern, as the driver may inadvertently over-steer when the binding releases.

Steering Angle Sensor and ADAS Integration Failures

The steering angle sensor is a critical component that measures the precise angular position of the steering wheel throughout its range of rotation. This information is used by virtually every advanced safety system in the vehicle: the electronic stability control system uses steering angle to calculate the driver’s intended direction and compare it to the vehicle’s actual yaw rate; the lane keep assist system uses steering angle as an input for its path prediction algorithm; the adaptive cruise control system uses steering angle to understand the vehicle’s path; and in vehicles with four-wheel steering, the rear wheel steering system uses front steering angle to calculate appropriate rear wheel angle. A defective steering angle sensor that provides incorrect angle data causes multiple safety systems to malfunction simultaneously, generating a cascade of warning lights and disabling features that drivers may rely on for safety.

Steering angle sensor failures often manifest after wheel alignment service, wheel bearing replacement, or other suspension or steering repairs that disturb the steering geometry — even when the sensor itself is not replaced. If the sensor is not recalibrated to the new alignment geometry after these repairs, it provides offset data to all dependent safety systems. However, steering angle sensors also fail from manufacturing defects — internal encoder failures, harness connector corrosion at the sensor’s electrical connection in the steering column, and software defects in the sensor’s output processing. A steering angle sensor that requires recalibration or replacement without any preceding alignment or suspension work has failed from a manufacturing defect that is covered under warranty.

Lane keeping assist steering actuator failures — where the EPS system’s ability to provide automatic steering corrections for lane keeping is lost — disable a safety feature that some drivers have come to rely on for driver fatigue management on long highway drives. While lane keep assist is an optional feature rather than a primary steering control, its sudden failure after functioning correctly can be disorienting for drivers accustomed to the system’s assistance. More significantly, some vehicles’ lane keep assist systems provide active lane centering that maintains the vehicle’s position continuously — a much more active function than simple warning-and-correct behavior. When active lane centering fails on a vehicle marketed specifically for semi-autonomous driving capability, the failure substantially impairs the vehicle’s use relative to the owner’s reasonable expectations at the time of purchase.

Steering Lemon Law by Make

Select your vehicle’s manufacturer below to see make-specific steering lemon law claims, documented defects, and California remedies for your brand.

AcuraAlfa RomeoAudiBMWBuickCadillacChevroletChryslerDodgeFIATFordGenesisGMCHondaHyundaiINFINITIJaguarJeepKiaLand RoverLexusLincolnLucidMazdaMercedes-BenzMINIMitsubishiNissanPolestarPorscheRAMRivianScoutSubaruTeslaToyotaVinFastVolkswagenVolvo

Other Vehicle Defect Types Covered

California Lemon Law covers all major defect categories. Explore other problem types below — your vehicle may qualify on multiple grounds.

EngineTransmissionElectricalBrakesBattery & EVSuspensionAC & HVACInfotainmentAirbag & SafetyPowertrainPaint & BodyWindows & DoorsADAS / AutopilotFuel SystemEmissionsSeatbeltsHybrid SystemFrame & StructuralWater Intrusion

California's #1 Lemon Law Attorney

Ranked #1 best lemon law attorney in California, Jacob Shayesteh has won over 3,000 cases and recovered $30M+ for consumers — at $0 out of pocket. See the full ranking: Best Lemon Law Attorneys in California.